Review: Hood (King Raven #1) by Stephen R. Lawhead

233. Hood (King Raven #1) by Stephen R. Lawhead

Publication: Thomas Nelson (June 5, 2007), Paperback, 472pp / ISBN 9781595540881

Genre: Historical Fiction, Fantasy


Read: November 19, 2009

Source: Bought


I got this a few months ago when BookCloseouts was having a big scratch-and-dent sale. It looked interesting, and I don’t think I’ve read anything Robin Hood-related since the last time I read The Once and Future King. But that whole thing in the woods with Robin and his merry men made me want to puke with the mushiness hippie-ness of it all, so I was excited to read something that took a more realistic approach.

As a whole, I don’t think it was an utter waste of my time. I enjoyed most of it, and even though some parts really annoyed me, they didn’t annoy me enough to stop reading it. However, looking back I had a lot more problems with it than I had, uh, non-problems, and that’s why I don’t think I’ll be reading the next two books in the series.

Summary from Amazon:

For centuries, the legend of Robin Hood and his band of thieves has captivated the imagination. Now the familiar tale takes on new life, fresh meaning, and an unexpected setting.

Steeped in Celtic mythology and the political intrigue of medieval Britain, Stephen R. Lawhead’s latest work conjures up an ancient past and holds a mirror to contemporary realities. Prepare yourself for an epic tale that dares to shatter everything you thought you knew about Robin Hood.

It starts off with extremely high action, which is probably why I kept reading it through to the end– the action sequences are very action-y, and I needed a bit of an adrenaline kick after my last book. The middle is more slow but it’s building back up the tension and by the end it’s really exciting again.

So, the best part of the book: the fight sequences.

I also like the whole reboot. Robin Hood in Wales? Cool! I like Wales. I also liked that it had a paranormal/fantasy kind of tint to it; at first I thought it was weird, but then I figured it was like King Arthur or something and then it really worked for me. But then came the problems.

The characters were flat. It was interesting to see how Mr Lawhead changed them from the original versions, especially Robin/Bran, who’s more selfish and lazy and a bit of a player at the beginning. He changes by the end, though he’s still a bit of a coward. But I liked seeing him evolve through the story.

However, the rest of the characters were either bland or so all over the place with their emotions they turned into jesters. It wasn’t unusual for someone to be REALLY FREAKING ANGRY and then two sentences later they’re calm and calculating. Not just one dude, by the way, but almost all the dudes entirely. And not either of those emotions were convincing; it was like watching Plan 9 From Outer Space set in the middle ages. Merian and Bran definitely had the worst conversations: they were utterly unconvincing and Merian turned into a standard fake-strong female heroine trope instead of staying the most convincingly real person in the whole cast. Disappointing.

The writing was, as I said last Thursday, trying too hard to be clever. I said that when it tried to be clever instead of being enjoyable like an in-joke it came off more like “you’re too stupid to figure it out so I’ll explain because I’m so smart” kind of thing. Really annoying, though it didn’t happen too many times. And the writing wasn’t overly horrible, it just wasn’t up to par with things like The Winter King.

The plot itself wasn’t bad. It was pretty good, actually! And like I said, I like the whole reboot-a-myth thing. But the writing and the characters just dragged it down, and the fight sequences weren’t enough to lift it back up. I’m sort of torn, though. I liked it, kinda. And I for sure didn’t hate it. But I feel sort of wishy-washy about it. Ambivalent! That’s what I mean. I’m ambivalent.

If you think you’d like reading a Robin Hood story in a new setting with slightly changed characters and plot, then you might like this. But– I’d get it from the library just in case you don’t.


Find your own copy @ Amazon or IndieBound.

Other reviews: Miss Picky’s Column | Eye on Everything | A Writer’s Daydreams

Read a sample chapter.
– Check out this album that was inspired by the book!

Bookmark and Share

0 thoughts on “Review: Hood (King Raven #1) by Stephen R. Lawhead”

  1. Wow, it has clearly been way too long since I read The Once & Future King, because I didn’t even remotely remember that Robin Hood was even in it. How was Robin Hood in it? Robin Hood is Richard I! So bewildering…

    1. I know, it was a complete mindbender when he showed up. It was in The Sword in the Stone, near the end. Arthur is…chasing the questing beast, I think? He runs into Robin in the woods and after a bit where White talks about the idealness of Robin’s camp and how all the merry men are awesome and they’re all seven foot tall and can kill bears with their bare hands, etc etc, and how much Robin and Marian are in love with each other and they SING A SONG LIKE NEVER A SONG WAS SUNG BEFORE~ after all that, they go and attack Morgan’s tower together and I think Arthur kills something. I don’t really remember besides the complete WTFness of it all.


      1. Can I reccommend another ‘Robin Hood’ book that’s out at the moment, its called ‘Hodd’ by Adam Thorpe, printed by Jonathan Cape, London.

        A medieval document is rescued from a ruined church on the Somme, and translated from the original Latin. It is the testimony of a monk called Mathew, it describes life with the half/crazed bandit Hodd in the greenwood-who, following the thirteenth century principles of the ‘heresy of the Free Spirit.’

        It is so much more than just another ‘Robin Hood’ book, the quality of the writing is first-class and deserves an award.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.